VM curriculum designing

Training material development on VM curriculum designing was lead by VMU and KUL with the involvement of other partners. E-learning centres' staff or other staff members from consortium institutions worked collaboratively online to develop training material with practical assignments and templates, as well as video or audio explanations on how to design VM curriculum and what are peculiarities in such process.

Unit 5. Quality Assurance of Curriculum Design for Virtual Mobility

5.5. Support and interactivity

Support is necessary for both teachers and students.  While providing virtual mobility course at home university teachers will need organizational and pedagogical support. Peer support and information and guidance is compulsory for learners. And both teachers and learners will need some kind of technological support and resources:

 Firstly, there is a need to have an adequate technology infrastructure that enhance connectivity and links of various learning and pedagogical technologies together.  Secondly, there is a need to support teachers by instructing them how to use technology effectively.  Thirdly, technology in learning is needed to support the student and provide an opportunity to learn and interact with teachers and peers.

It is important for the virtual mobility course that teachers fully understand the process of such teaching, the structure of the changed learning environment, are aware of how to build relationships with multicultural groups of students, ways of supporting them in their self-regulated learning. 

As Beck (2008)[1] has implied a teacher has to find new ways to encourage students learn the material as well as develop their competencies and higher thinking skills. Students must be taught to “reproduce existing knowledge, discuss and challenge existing knowledge and to apply subject discourses to simple and complex problem solving” (p. 480). To find these new ways pedagogical support for teachers is highly important.

Not only the satisfaction of students has to be ensured, but, emphasize, an understanding of students’ needs is essential. Jacklin and Riche (2009)[2] in a qualitative study found that information, advice and guidance is one of the main support dimensions for the student.

A well designed support system for teachers and learners has the following features: facilitated information search options, technology handbooks and integration kits, TEL users and courses administration options, accessibility options of different TEL curriculum forms and devices, frequently asked questions and complaints‘ options, immediate accessibility to pedagogical and technological help, peer support, learning accessibility in different forms, investigation of learners‘ needs and expectations, building online communities of learners, and social presence in virtual learning environment.

 

Reviewing support provision methods 

Begin by thinking about support provision methods  are used for students. The questions below will help guide your reflection.

Support methods 

 

Yes

No

Study subject guide

 

 

Timetable/ schedule

 

 

Additional possibilities provided by distance/ online study mode are explained and presented to students

 

 

Technical requirements to participate in online studies are presented to students

 

 

Personal progress assessment tools are presented

 

 

Intermediate tasks are designed

 

 

Communication and collaboration tools are provided

 

 

Reflection tools are provided

 

 

Learning resources are provided in a printable option

 

 

Other _________________________________

 

 

The communication during virtual mobility course is intense and demanding. The teacher must feel good about communicating and interacting with students both in written and oral format because that is a base element in the process. There are several types of interaction in virtual learning environments (i.e. student-teacher, student-student, and student-content); however, the interactions that proves to play a major role in quality assurance in virtual mobility are student-teacher interactions. Virtual mobility learning courses should be developed to promote and facilitate healthy interactions between the learner and the instructor.

 

Reviewing interaction and communication  

The questions below will help guide your reflection. Use the following criteria as a basis for evaluating virtual mobility course curriculum.  Think  about all five sections.

1.Interaction among Learners

Yes

No

                   Discussion Boards and/or chat available

 

 

                   Group activities

 

 

                   Email

 

 

                  Orientation to technology is provided

 

 

2.Interaction between learners and teacher

 

 

             Teacher conveys policy on answering emails (i.e. how soon students can expect response

 

 

              Teacher communicates how will give feedback, including frequency of feedback on discussion forums, assignments

 

 

               Feedback is evident through announcements, emails, discussion postings, or other means

 

 

3.Interaction between Learners and Instructional Materials

 

 

             Students receive orientation to practice posting in Discussion forum, submitting to dropbox, taking online exam, and using any other type of technology that will be utilized during the course

 

 

Resources for completing course activities are provided

 

 

      Guidelines for posting to discussion board and/or participating in Chat are provided

 

 

4.Collaboration

 

 

         Students are provided the opportunity to collaborate with other students through group work or other means

 

 

          Groups diversity and multiculturalism is foreseen

 

 

5.Pace and Procrastination

 

 

           All due dates are published with timely reminders

 

 

            Progress through the course is documented

 

 


[1] Beck, S. (2008). The teacher's role and approaches in a knowledge society. Cambridge Journal of Education, 38, 465-481.

[2] Jacklin, A. & Riche, P. (2009). Reconceptualising student support: from ‘support’ to ‘supportive’. Studies in Higher Education,  34 (7), 735–749.